steepholm (steepholm) wrote,

Performance-Related Pay - a Socratic Dialogue

MP: Public sector pay rises are only justified where there is trouble recruiting – as with nurses, GPs, and so on.

Socrates: But there’s never any shortage of people wanting to be MPs. There are several candidates at every election, and most of those have been chosen from other shortlists within their own parties. So how can you justify the large pay rises you regularly vote through for yourselves?

MP: We need to make sure that our pay keeps pace with people doing comparable jobs in the private sector, or we will lose the best people. It’s not just numbers that are important, it’s quality.

Socrates: And yet you don’t apply that argument to, say, university academics, who’ve had real-terms pay cuts for over a decade now? Their pay has fallen far behind that of people in comparable private-sector posts.

MP: I have seen no evidence that the quality of academic work has fallen. They’re doing more for less, so of course they don’t deserve a pay rise.

Socrates: Whereas… MPs deserve a pay rise because they’re crap?

MP: That’s right. And that, my friend, is what we mean by “performance-related pay”.

Socrates: I feel a migraine coming on...
Tags: maunderings
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded