steepholm (steepholm) wrote,
steepholm
steepholm

Socrates lies prostrated, Protagoras triumphs

I'm not sure whether this is a new phenomenon, or whether I've just started to notice it more, but I've been struck during radio news reports over the last few days by the BBC's habit of reporting uncontentious facts as if they were questionable opinions. I should have jotted down examples as I heard them, but they tend to appear as manifestations of the BBC's commitment to "balance". Thus, we'll get something like: "The Government claims that unemployment has fallen, but the TUC says that wages haven't kept up with inflation."

Well, both those statements are demonstrably true - leaving aside whether they're relevant, cherry-picked, etc. I would prefer both "claims" and "says" in the sentence above to be replaced with "points out". That way we can make at least a grammatical distinction between statements of fact, rhetorical flourishes, deliberate ambiguities, and on-the-fly redefinitions of important words such as "deficit", and the like - helping to keep the waters of political discourse running just a little more clearly. It might also help skewering of outright lies, such as that of Grant Shapps yesterday:

There’s only one definition of the deficit and that’s the amount of overspend in the economy by comparison to the size of the overall economy.


Humpty Dumpty would blush. Suffice it to say that if you offered that definition in an Economics exam you'd get a big fat X.

Not that I expect anything to change. Ever since the battle to save the distinction between "deny" and "refute" was lost, we pedantic grumps have been fighting a rearguard action.
Tags: current affairs, language
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 5 comments