Log in

No account? Create an account

Don't Eat With Your Mouth Full

Where can we live but days?

steepholm steepholm
Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Japanese Diary 17 - Cow Readings and Beef Readings
Here is another in my continuing series of facile analogies between Japanese and English. This is how we learn - or how I learn, at any rate.

I've heard it said that one of the ways the history of the Norman conquest is written into the English language is in the way that the words for stock animals - pig/swine, cow, sheep - are Anglo-Saxon, as used by the peasants who had to look after them, while the words for the cooked meats as served to their masters - pork, beef, mutton - come from Norman French. It seems a bit too neat, but it illustrates what's basically a sound point: a language is a storehouse of the history of its speakers. French (and later Latin) vocabulary has been absorbed into English at a deep level, so that today often it's often possible to make a stylistic choice between Germanic and French/Latin alternatives for things and concepts, while new coinages can draw on either. There are fashions in these matters: a hundred years ago inventors were all about the Latinisms, or even Latin-Greek chimeras such as "television" (contrast German's homely Fernseher). In the computer age Anglo-Saxon has made a comeback, reflecting the more demotic and unbuttoned language of geeks on both sides of the Atlantic, but particularly in the United States.

English is full of "foreign" words, but when a new foreign word enters English it tends to go through period of quarantine known as italicization. It's not always clear how long this is meant to last. Is it still de rigueur to write de rigueur? May one write simply of the zeitgeist, or must it be Zeitgeist? Those two have been around for a long time, but no one thinks to italicize "karaoke", which is of far more recent date. Perhaps this is because with some terms the foreignness is the point, or they refer back to some particular point of origin: write Zeitgeist and you evoke Hegel; write "Spirit of the Age" and you evoke Hazlitt (or Hawkwind).

Japanese is much more thoroughgoing in its demarcation of foreign words, reserving a whole script (katakana) to their use. Katakana has a much longer history, and it's only in recent times that it's come to be associated with linguistic imports (I'm not sure why/how), but perhaps it's not inappropriate to see it as roughly equivalent to English italicization - especially since katakana (like italics, itself a much older script with its roots in Caroline minuscule) can also be used for emphasis with words of native origin. I suppose the wholesale import of Western (predominantly but not exclusively English) words is of fairly recent (post-Meiji) date, but it would interesting to know whether there will ever be a time when common words like "パン" (i.e. pan = bread - an import from French ETA Portugese in this case) lose the italics, as it were, and get written in hiragana (ぱん).

But, like English, Japanese also has another language in its deep history: Chinese. There are even two number systems, one native Japanese (hitotsu, futatsu, mittsu...) and one Chinese (ichi, ni, san...)* - and almost all the kanji have at least two readings, one Kun (Japanese) and one On (Chinese). So year (年), for example, is toshi in Japanese, but can also be read in the Chinese manner as nen. so that 先年 ETA 去年 (last year) is pronounced kyonen. Generally, the Chinese reading is used when the kanji is a compound, and the Japanese reading when the kanji is used on its own, but this I'm told is only a very rough rule of thumb. No katakana for these Chinese words, notice, any more than "beef" or "mutton" get italicized. (I wonder whether modern Chinese imports, if any, get the katakana treatment, though, as modern French imports do here?)

What I'd be fascinated to know is whether Japanese writers ever make (or made) a choice between words of Japanese or Chinese origin for stylistic effect, and whether it makes a difference to the timbre of their writing similar to the choice between an English style in which French or Latin words predominate, and one that maximizes words with Germanic roots.

* There's no French number system quite like that in English, although we do have count words like "dozen", which obviously derives from douze.

Interesting stuff, especially about italic.

For numbers, there's yan, tan, tethera...

Ooh, I didn't know about that! Thank you - that's really fascinating; and Wiki has some great charts of regional variations.

My favourite is 15 in Derbyshire... "Peddero-o-bumfitt".

I thought "pan" in Japanese was from Portuguese. It's listed as such in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Japanese_words_of_Portuguese_origin

Ah, you're right - my bad. That does make more historical sense, anyway.

Yes indeed, about Japanese using Chinese versus native words for effect -- and have been since they started writing. For one obvious example, classical poetry is written entirely in native vocabulary, and it was not until the modern era that ye standard colloquial diction, with all its nativized Chinese vocabulary, were considered acceptable. But even aside from that, in modern prose, the percentage of Chinese words changes the tenor greatly, just as the ratio of Germanic/Grecolatin does in English, only even more obviously (because Chinese words will generally ONLY be in kanji).

BTW, pan is from Portuguese, not French, dating to the earliest Western contacts -- it's been a loan-word for so long, many Japanese aren't aware it's even a loan-word and it's frequently spelled ぱん. And FWIW, while most English imports are post-Meiji, the significant numbers of German and French date to Meiji times.


Thank you for all that. It's good to know that my broader hunches (if not my specific claim about パン) were on the right lines.

it's been a loan-word for so long, many Japanese aren't aware it's even a loan-word and it's frequently spelled ぱん

Ditto for this - which does tend to underscore the italics analogy.

Edited at 2014-01-06 07:17 am (UTC)

Yup -- it's one of the bits of evidence (along with たばこ, tabacco) for how current usage is very much like English italics.

When katakana shows up in the middle of a sentence, I stumble a bit when it turns out to be regular word being given emphasis, rather than a loan-word.


Although the French do have douzaine (and vingtaine, trentaine etc)

Do you mean 去年 and not sennen (先年)?

I think I do - thank you for the correction! My kanji reading is at the toddler stage.